The Head of the Ukrainian Institute of National Memory (UINM) Anton Drobovych stated in an interview with «Radio Svoboda» on October 3rd that he has requested the Ukrainian Cabinet of Ministers to allocate 1 million hryvnias from the state budget for 2025 for search works related to historical issues.
This decision by the UINM leader has been met with both praise and criticism from various groups and individuals. Some see it as a necessary step towards preserving and uncovering the truth about Ukraine’s past, while others view it as a waste of resources and an attempt to manipulate historical narratives.
Drobovych, who has been at the helm of UINM since 2014, has been a vocal advocate for the study and commemoration of Ukraine’s history, particularly the events of the 20th century. He believes that the allocation of funds for search works will help shed light on important historical events and bring closure to families of victims of political repression and other tragedies.
The UINM, established in 2006, is responsible for researching and promoting the history of Ukraine, as well as preserving the memory of its victims of totalitarian regimes. The institute has been actively involved in organizing exhibitions, conferences, and educational programs to raise awareness about the country’s past.
In his interview, Drobovych emphasized the importance of these search works, stating that they are crucial for understanding the country’s history and building a strong national identity. He also noted that the allocated funds will be used for various projects, such as the search for mass graves, identification of victims, and digitization of archival materials.
This decision has been met with support from many historians and researchers who have long been advocating for more resources to be allocated towards uncovering the truth about Ukraine’s past. They believe that these search works will not only bring closure to families but also contribute to a more accurate understanding of the country’s history.
However, there are also those who criticize this decision, arguing that the allocated funds could be better used for other pressing issues in the country, such as healthcare and education. Some also question the motives behind this decision, suggesting that it may be used to manipulate historical narratives and promote a certain political agenda.
Despite the differing opinions, it is clear that the UINM’s request for funds for search works has sparked a much-needed discussion about the importance of preserving and understanding Ukraine’s history. It also highlights the ongoing struggle to reconcile different interpretations of the past and the need for a balanced and objective approach to historical research.
In conclusion, the decision by the UINM leader to request funds for search works related to historical issues is a significant step towards uncovering the truth about Ukraine’s past. It is a testament to the country’s commitment to preserving its history and honoring the victims of totalitarian regimes. With proper allocation and management of these funds, it is hoped that these search works will bring about a better understanding and appreciation of Ukraine’s rich and complex history.